Fat Burning Anti Aging Kitchen
When it comes to diet plan things can get made complex. Particularly in the context of whether a diet plan may have anti-aging potential. Diet regimen includes not just make-up, however wealth and also timing. And if you consider it, also a details diet plan can have much variation in each of these variables relying on your lifestyle as well as where the food was sourced. So, in this video, with the help of an interesting recent review write-up you must entirely have a look at if you can, I will discuss the different diets consisting of caloric constraint, intermittent fasting- (IF), fasting-mimicking diet plans (FMD), ketogenic diet regimens, time-restricted feeding (TRF), protein restriction and also restriction of particular amino acids and also see what are the most and also least promising as an anti-aging diet regimen, at least based upon current details. What is it about these diets that have actually led to them being described as "anti-aging", whats the evidence and what are the continuing to be inquiries as well as possibly what you're eager to hear, what is one of the most appealing anti-aging diet regimen. And also also, I will consist of some common misconceptions regarding diet regimens so you'll want to hang around till after that.
Find me on Twitter –
I have Patreon –
TIMESTAMPS:
Introduction – 00:00
Caloric Constraint – 01:20
Keto diets – 02:30
IF & FMD – 03:10
TRF – 04:20
Reduced protein – 05:00
Which is best? – 06:00
Exactly how does it job – mTOR – 07:00
Diet plan crazes, fact or fiction – 08:00
Ideas – 08:50
REFERENCES:
Antiaging diets: Dividing truth from fiction –
Symbols in introductory;" "Background vector developed by freepik – www.freepik.com
What diet do you follow?
I have a see food diet. When I see food I eat it.
Once again muchas gracias.
Apart from modulating calories, macronutrients and feeding window, there’s also antioxidant, polyphenol, phytonutrient etc. optimization. So if we compare someone who eats a lot of veg/fruit, fish, healthy carbs and fats etc. with someone who eats a lot of bad food (candy, processed food), even if they eat within the same feeding window and eat the same amount of protein, the first person will most probably live considerably longer.
I’m fibromyalgia patient.Have sciaticaAnd extreme headache.. bedridden..age 37 female….I take painkillers 5times aday..I want to know how can I live few years longer so that I can spend time with my 2children…. your videos are so precious to me that note down important things in my diary..love from India ❤️
Great video Eleanor, very well presented & highly insightful. Thank you 🤗
I’m 73 and haven’t been to a doctor in 60 years. Never followed any diet for a long time. But I have fast since I was about 14. At 14 I remember fasting for 4 days. I still fast sometimes times up to 7 days. I’ve never drank pop or eat much junk food or been overweight.
you better stay away from crispy cremes.
I don’t understand calorie restriction. I always think of it as just losing weight. Is this true? If not, could someone point out the flaw in my thought process?
I think CR is defined as eating below maintenance for an extended period of time.
Everyone has a certain amount of calories at which they will maintain their weight. Eating more (without moving more) means gaining weight, eating less means losing weight. If u eat below maintenance for an extended amount of time (CR), you will just lose weight and consequently burn less. This means you will just keep losing weight until you’re new calorie intake is sufficient to maintain your new weight.
So basically CR equates to losing weight and maintaining that new weight. But being at maintenance calories means it’s not a CR diet anymore (according to the definition I used).
What I thought of while writing the comment above:
If a CR diet is just losing weight, it would be logical that CR is not good for everyone. We know that losing weight is healthy but only until a certain point.
Yeah, permanent CR doesn’t seem sustainable
I have sashimi 2-3x a week. Other than that, it’s a vegan wfpb diet for the rest of the week. High fiber, low-ish protein, lots of raw vegetables.
It’s not CR below sustainable as we can see in this video 5:17 it’s more like a 60% restriction of the ad libitum
@wellthi I have never seen any of these videos…thank you for taking out time to recommend all videos.thank you very much
@Nightshade thank you very much
@Ben Steele thank you very much… your words means alot to me…I’m so obliged to you
Most people are on unhealthy diets with nutritional deficiencies and conditions of metabolic syndrome. Missing meals on an unhealthy standard American diet is unhealthy. Whereas fasting on a healthy keto diet is healthy. There is a vast difference between those two.
A contributing factor is that, on a high-carb standard American diet, skipping breakfast likely means drinking lots of sugary caffeinated drinks instead. Then, because of the cravings from a high-carb diet, the person will end up snacking all day on carbs. That doesn’t happen with decreased cravings with ketosis.
Like the point that was made O’ so well in your previous video with doctor Brad, “the more we learn the more we don’t know”…
@Richard Breeze Reducing the amount of calories that you should tale in half, doubles the life expectancy. At least in rats. Taking into consideration people I know that live for more than 90yo (quite a few, not gonna lie) never did any fasting aside from the april / may shortage of local food products, I don’t know how those researches translate to humans.
@Sigourney Di Blasi – Thousands of studies show that anything that reduces calories, from calorie restriction to fasting, improves health outcomes. It’s part of why a keto diet is also effective, in that ketosis decreases hunger and cravings. Many people on keto diets unintentionally reduce their calorie intake and eat fewer meals (i.e., fast), which is why it’s so effective as a weight-loss diet. If anything, one has to be conscious to eat plenty of food or at least higher calorie foods while in ketosis to avoid the negative side effects. That is the problem with calorie restriction, in that it can lead to muscle loss if one isn’t careful.
By the way, ketosis itself is an additional benefit, as it reduces inflammation and has been used as a medical treatment for numerous health conditions: neurocognitive disorders (epileptic seizures, Alzheimer’s, etc), autoimmune disorders (multiple sclerosis, etc), and metabolic disorder (obesity, diabetes, etc). Guess what increases with calorie restriction and fasting? Ketosis. That is because, in both cases, carbs are being restricted or in the latter case temporarily eliminated. In fasting, one has to first enter ketosis before getting to greater increases of autophagy.
Yet ketosis is always happening at some level. It’s so essential that leucine and lysine are solely ketogenic, such that they can only be activated by ketones. Amino acids are not only building blocks of protein for they also act as signaling molecules that regulate various biological functions. This is why peptides, made of amino acids, have gained so much attention in the health field. About leucine, in particular, it is required for initiating protein synthesis. So, without ketones, you’d wither away and die. This is a likely contributing factor to why these methods are effective, as they increase ketosis.
Some of this info comes from Angela A. Stanton. She is a doctor and university researcher. There is some fascinating data she has gathered. As already known from studies, fetuses are develop while in ketosis, babies are born in ketosis, and infants remain in ketosis while breastfeeding. But what Stanton found was that every child she measured, up to age 10, was always in ketosis; even if they were on a high-carb diet. That is how important ketosis is, maybe because of its role in protein synthesis and hence growth. She had more limited data that indicated many and maybe most individuals continue in ketosis through young adulthood. What might finally knock us out of ketosis as we age is simply metabolic disorder, as one study found 88% of Americans are metabolically unfit.
Autophagy can be measured. They measure it all the time in studies. We scientifically know what increases and decreases autophagy. Jason Fung is pointing to the fact that autophagy varies greatly according to the individual. If one is in ketosis, for example, one goes into autophagy more quickly on a fast than if one is not in ketosis. This is what studies have shown. There have been thousands of studies on autophagy over many decades. It’s not hard knowledge to find. A simple web search will easily pull up such studies, if one wants to find them.
@Ben Steele ok point me to one study that shows fasting increases autophagy in humans ( not rats that cheating because after 48 hours of fasting a rat is so energetically challenged it will lose 20 % of its bodyweight. It is not the same thing and cannot be extrapolated. Just one study I will be satisfied with that…
@Ben Steele ok I will have a look at these
One could pull up many more studies and scientific papers. Fasting and autophagy have been researched for a long time. This isn’t a new field and our knowledge about it is already well established at such a basic level. There is no scientific debate or doubt about fasting being a cause of increased autophagy.
“What diet do you follow?” I think the Blue Zones (places in the world where people live not just the longest, but also with the least amounts of chronic diseases) approach is a pretty good Best Bet for a number of reasons:
1. It’s something that works in a real world setting, not just in mice studies etc
2. It’s the result effectively of a very large natural experiment; ie which of thousands of different populations in the world have the best health outcomes, with just 5 of those thousands coming out on top.
3. It seems to align pretty well with longevity studies in that the Blue Zones diet is largely plant-based (95%+) and low in protein (15%) (with fats at around 20%, and 65% complex carbohydrates)
Key is to connect DNL with cristolysis ( cristae structure) ☝️
What are your views on high protein and low carb diet e.g. lots of non starchy plants and plants based protein plus collagen in an effort to prevent and reverse age related sarcopenia? Increasing strength with age and reducing risk of falls, osteoporosis?
Keto with OMAD, with periodic prolong fasting. Moderate amount of protein.
Svante Forsman wrote and then deleted the following comment: “OK so why not do an experiment on yourself. Do a zero carb diet and see how long you live. I would not bet on you reaching 100 years.” There was more to the comment, but that is all the preview showed in my notifications.
To answer that part of it, there is no such thing as an actual zero carb diet. Even meat has some carbs in it. Besides, gluconeogenesis will produce all of the glucose the body needs. There are pathways for glucose to be produced from not only carbs but also protein, fat, and other sources.
There was a part of another sentence Svante wrote that was cut off in the preview. He seemed to be arguing there is no low-carb research showing positive health outcomes. If that is what he was really arguing, the science disagrees with him. There is a vast amount of low-carb research showing benefits.
Sure, we could argue about exact carb levels, about continuous and cyclical ketosis, about feasting and fasting, and on and on. There is diverse evidence out there on any given point of debate. But that low-carb diets in general are healthy is about as settled as science gets in nutrition studies.
Apparently I’ve been doing a keto diet since 2018 but didn’t know it had a name. I just compiled a bunch of information from my favorite doctors and acted upon it.
I think we should start basing these restrictions on blood types to see if there are any differences. If that’s a no go, we can then go for the more complicated ways of figuring out why it doesn’t work for everyone.
Hi I enjoy your contents and subject matter. Would you do a piece on dysphasia. Attempting to discover break through science like herbs and such. Appreciate your time and effort
I fully agree. The Blue Zones diet is the only one proven to work long term, and have results to show for it (ie many real life examples of folks achieving very long and healthy lives).
While many diets may work for certain individuals to achieve better health (keto or CR for examples), I’ve yet to see evidence that followers of those diets achieve the same longevity as the Blue Zones diet in actual humans, or the same quality of life or health span. I’d be happy to change my views and even my eating habit if someone can show me longevity data on strict followers of those diets. I’d love to try eating as much bacon and steak as I can throughout the day! Or, following CR and save a boatload of money on food, without worrying feeling cold all day and lose the sex drive.
I don’t follow a specific diet but I think that some foods are beneficial. There are potential health effects of garlic, ginger, green tea, beans, walnuts, berries, fatty fish, and green leafy vegetables. E.g. research on garlic is quite extensive and it seems that it has some great anti-cancer effects and is helpful for fatigue.
You don’t need carbs to live i.e. ingesting externally, protein gets converted into carbs via gluconeogenesis. That being said, the data on protein and BCCAs etc. is annoying re longevity because we’re screwed – as protein is muscle sparing, has higher thermic effect, increases satiety, and generally higher amounts betters healthspan yet opposite for longevity.
Amazing that some people liked the blue zone approach. Pay a visit to Costa Rica and Sardinia like I have, you may have different conclusions
A kind of high protein Keto w some IF. Its true that it activates mTor from the protein. But protein is so essential for health and muscle mass. Muscle mass reduces all cause mortality as does VO2 max. Additionally, protein is so useful as proteins are used like little machines in the body to help various reactions.
You still get autophagy benefits from the times you are fasting – so not convinced mTor is the end of the world. David Sinclair looks like a physically weak man with his low protein diet. That might be okay when you are 50 but you consume protein less efficiently as you age. By the time he is 70 or 80 not sure he will be able to move that well.
It’s perfectly fine to vilify sugar and carbohydrates. They were not found in our past (before agriculture) and our body is not well suited to eating them. The problem with using mice all the time for studies is that they are herbivores. Early humans were thought by some to be scavengers. Our digestive system is close to a dogs.
Let me whip out my YouTube PHD. 😂 great work
I do the seafood diet. I see food and eat it. 😂
@Ben Steele Keto seems to help brain functioning judging by the amazing quality of your posts.
I think low carb is pretty proven science – but the hot question is how much protein. I don’t give a damn about mTor. I think that people need a lot of protein because it improves muscle mass and fights sarcopenia.
These are huge problems in the elderly. They are weak and immobile, and they didn’t have to be. if they had used resistance training and kept protein levels high, they would have aged much better.
The calorie restricting diet isn’t a proper term from a metabolic point of view. I don’t want to sound condescendant but what a lot of people fail to realize is that if I burn 2500 calories per day and I drop it to 2000. In the long run, my body will adapt and slow down my metabolism to 2000 calories.
The real question is: does having a slower metabolism beneficial? The #1 factor for cancer death in teens and young adults is GH, hence why an elderly person in their 70’s have less chance of dying of the same cancer than someone in their 20’s. That’s one of the main point against using synthetic growth hormone for longevity as you promote the potential growth of cancer cells.
In your opinion, is it a fair assessment?
I had been a “health oriented vegan” until I discovered I had developed a blood sugar problem, and got a DNA test showing I’m mostly Scandinavian (a mostly pescaterian hunter gather type ancestral profile), and have an extremely high need for choline. I decided to try the “old” ZoneDiet (see latest book, “The Resolution Zone”), and used Cronometer to create a repeatable menu. This was over 2 years ago and it has stuck. I use a CGM periodically which confirms my glucose is in healthy range as long as I follow the diet, but not if I don’t.
I think it’s crap science (there, I said it) to insist that the calories be equalized for mice on an all-day diet vs an intermittent fasting diet in the tests. Part of the benefit of intermittent fasting is the natural caloric restriction which occurs by stopping eating at a certain hour. I don’t care how complicated this makes the research for isolating the intervention; you had might as well simply not do the study with equivalent calories.
I’m a male in his 50s who had reached a belly circumference of 53 inches / 135 cm last July. I began intermittent fasting by simply refusing to eat anything after 4 pm every single day since then and I am now down to a belly circumference of 45 inches / 115 cm. I understand this video and topic are not about weight loss, but I know that, for humans, daily intermittent fasting will usually also translate to reduced calories when compared to all-day feeding.
sandyterrace.com
불이 완전히 꺼진 뒤 연구소 연구원들만 진입하기 시작했다.